The ethics of artificial intelligence: What talk data ?

3 min readJan 22, 2021

more a specific word appears in reference columns in dataset

It is necessary to explore the full ethical, social and legal aspects of AI systems if we are to avoid unintended, negative consequences and risks arising from the implementation of AI in society.

software-based AI and intelligent robots (i.e. robots with an embedded AI) when exploring ethical issues.

Artificial intelligence refers to systems that can be designed to take cues from their environment and, based on those inputs, proceed to solve problems, assess risks, make predictions, and take actions. In the era predating powerful computers and big data, such systems were programmed by humans and followed rules of human invention, but advances in technology have led to the development of new approaches.

Objective

Objective: Exploring ethical data and finding homogeneous subgroups such that variables in the same group (clusters) are more similar to each other than the others. Based on this clustering, we can assess the global ethic index of Issuer.

Aim 1: Clustering for Classification
Aim 2: assessment the global ethic index of Issuer

Data source :

Open data available on Google Sheets — Licence Creative Commons BY-NC-SA

Digital Policies Frameworks Database Data Set(UCI Repository: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mU2brATV_fgd5MRGfT2ASOFepAI1pivwhGm0VCT22_U/edit#gid=0 are used for this analysis.

Some variables :

Categorical variable

Reference(Principled Artificial Intelligence’,’ACT Project — Projet AJC (Autonomisation des acteurs judiciaires par la Cyberjustice)’,’AI, the global landscape of ethics guidelines’)
Issuer(‘Berkman Klein Center (University of Harvard)’,’Cyberjustice Laboratory’, ‘ETH Zurich’,’Fraunhofer, Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS’, ‘Handelsblatt Research Institute’)
Type (‘Meta-analysis’, ‘Research project’, ‘Academic paper’,’Report/Study’, ‘Principles/Guidelines/Charters’, ‘Policy paper’,’Non binding instrument’, ‘Parliamentary proceeding’,’Binding instrument’)
Link(‘https://ssrn.com/abstract=3518482', ‘https://www.ajcact.org', ‘https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1906/1906.11668.pdf','https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03400')
Origin(Academia’, ‘Civil Society’, ‘International Organisation’,’Multistakeholder’, ‘National Authorities’, ‘Private Sector’,’Professional association’, ‘Think Tank’)
Source(‘United States’, ‘Canada’, ‘Switzerland’, ‘Germany’, ‘Slovenia’,’United Kingdom’, ‘Italy’, ‘China’, ‘Australia’, ‘Netherlands’,’Austria’, ‘France’, ‘Denmark’, ‘Sweden’, ‘Lithuania’,’EU — Article 29 Working Party’, ‘Council of Europe’,’EU — Council of the European Union’, ‘EU — European Union’)